WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    05-26-2010
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Age
    61
    Posts
    1,410
    Images
    21

    Default Light Reading - Army Water Purification Study

    Ok not light (600+ pages), but the most comprehensive study I have seen on portable water purification systems. It is not new (2006), but covers just about every type of filter or treatment on the market at the time.

    http://tinyurl.com/3ksjgj8

    Rated all of them against 14 different measures using four different user profiles.

    The highest rated: MSR SwtWtr Purif.

    The lowest rated: H-P SteriPen D

    Page 25 of the PDF (16 of the study) has the summary for you all with ADD

    Anyway, just thought I'd share what I found. I still like my Steripen.

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bfayer View Post
    The lowest rated: H-P SteriPen D
    Admittedly I just scanned the study, but I'm a little confused that the Steripen has any score at all; figured it would be zero. A Steripen doesn't kill or remove anything, as far as I know; it just eliminates the ability of the pathogens to reproduce. Yet it actually has a score in this study, though a very low one. Does the Steripen actually kill stuff too?

    I'll have to read the study more carefully.

  3. #3

    Default

    I use bleach, the study only said it has somewhat of a problem with crypto.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    05-26-2010
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Age
    61
    Posts
    1,410
    Images
    21

    Default

    That is why there is an * next to the Steripen. It did not meet the basic requirements of the study. However, it is in common use in he military so they looked at it. The biggest issue they have with it is it's inability to deal with anything but clear water. Not much on an issue when you get to pick where you get water, but for he Army, their choices at any given moment may not be very good. the "clear" water may only be a quarter mile away, but impossible to get to.

    Also, they put less value into "light weight" than most hikers would.

    For the most part you don't need to read the whole thing, just the overview score chart and then go to the end to the report for the specific water treatment you are using or considering.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    05-26-2010
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Age
    61
    Posts
    1,410
    Images
    21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trailbender View Post
    I use bleach, the study only said it has somewhat of a problem with crypto.
    There is one more issue to be aware of:

    "Ultraviolet rays in sunlight degrade free chlorine compounds in water and significantly decrease disinfection efficacy over time. Chlorine concentrations may be reduced by one-half when exposed to sunlight for only 1 hour (reference 9). To mitigate these effects, chlorinatedderivatives of cyanuric acid, termed isocyanurates, are used to prolong the lifetime of free chlorine in water that is exposed to sunlight. The isocyanurate compound, originally introduced for swimming pool chlorine sanitation in 1960, dissociates in water to form both cyanuric acid, which “stabilizes” free chlorine compounds, and hypochlorous acid, the active disinfectant (reference 9). Chlorine concentrations may be prolonged 3 to 10 times longer in water when cyanuric acid is present in sufficient quantities (reference 9). Studies have shown that cyanuric acid does not interfere with disinfection conditions (reference 10) at concentrations used in drinking water. Some chlorine-using IWPDs may use isocyanurates to prolong chlorine residual in the treated water."

    In other words using pool bleach my be better than household bleach. Most people I know that use bleach keep it in a little translucent bottle and don't worry about it sitting on the picnic table for hours. After reading this, I would say keep it in a dark light resistant bottle and keep it in the pack when not being used.

    I don't see crypto as a major issue in the mid Atlantic states at least.

  6. #6
    Registered User ekeverette's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-08-2010
    Location
    greenville,north carolina
    Age
    65
    Posts
    395
    Journal Entries
    1

    Default

    damn! i didnt know all that.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bfayer View Post
    There is one more issue to be aware of:

    "Ultraviolet rays in sunlight degrade free chlorine compounds in water and significantly decrease disinfection efficacy over time. Chlorine concentrations may be reduced by one-half when exposed to sunlight for only 1 hour (reference 9). To mitigate these effects, chlorinatedderivatives of cyanuric acid, termed isocyanurates, are used to prolong the lifetime of free chlorine in water that is exposed to sunlight. The isocyanurate compound, originally introduced for swimming pool chlorine sanitation in 1960, dissociates in water to form both cyanuric acid, which “stabilizes” free chlorine compounds, and hypochlorous acid, the active disinfectant (reference 9). Chlorine concentrations may be prolonged 3 to 10 times longer in water when cyanuric acid is present in sufficient quantities (reference 9). Studies have shown that cyanuric acid does not interfere with disinfection conditions (reference 10) at concentrations used in drinking water. Some chlorine-using IWPDs may use isocyanurates to prolong chlorine residual in the treated water."

    In other words using pool bleach my be better than household bleach. Most people I know that use bleach keep it in a little translucent bottle and don't worry about it sitting on the picnic table for hours. After reading this, I would say keep it in a dark light resistant bottle and keep it in the pack when not being used.

    I don't see crypto as a major issue in the mid Atlantic states at least.
    I keep it in a transparent dropper bottle, but it stays in my pack until I use it. So I pull it out, use it, and put it back in the pocket. No worries there. I also keep my water out of the sun while it is being treated.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    03-10-2007
    Location
    Newport News, Virginia
    Posts
    284

    Default

    My daughter did her science fair project on this.(Army has a VERY thorough report).
    With our local Waterworks help she found the Steripen was the only less than effective method she tested. Colony of bacteria rebounded after 24 hours. So if using Steripen reteat any remaining water atleast daily or drink it faster.
    "Today I have grown taller from walking with the trees." Karle Wilson Baker

  9. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Compass View Post
    My daughter did her science fair project on this ... the Steripen was the only less than effective method she tested. Colony of bacteria rebounded after 24 hours. So if using Steripen reteat any remaining water atleast daily or drink it faster.
    I am very proud of my daughter, who is a PhD candidate in biology. If she did an experiment that showed such a result I would believe in her.

    I might even publish a note mentioning the results as a data point. Maybe.

    Would I state, baldly, "if using Steripen reteat any remaining water atleast daily or drink it faster"? No. Proud as I am, I would need a body of evidence to support such an extreme statement.

    You are very, _very_ proud of your daughter. I hope deservedly so, because you have, potentially, caused significant financial damage to a company and its employees if your comment is picked up on searches and widely dispersed among the hiker community.

    You and your daughter may have saved some lives.

  10. #10
    Registered User Fog Horn's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-03-2010
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Age
    41
    Posts
    399

    Default

    I noticed that Aquamira has absolutely no score for the Crypto. It looks like, by the first four categories, the best options are all filters.

    Its also amusing to me that even though it scored the lowest, the military uses the SteriPen and even issues it sparingly.

    Wil, if a child can do a study of this nature for a science fair project, surly anyone can do it. They sell water testing kits all over the place. He's just sharing a personal antecdote, not causing significant financial damage.

  11. #11
    Registered User goody5534's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-26-2011
    Location
    hartford, ct
    Age
    49
    Posts
    174
    Images
    164

    Default

    Listen, I respect and appreciate all of the men and women who choose to serve in our military but their methodologies are never the "best of" therefore I dont take this study very seriously. There are (2) inhernent flaws with accepting this study as a Gold Standard. First its over 5 yrs old, how many of these products tested have been changed to perform better or worse since then? And, secondly the Army regularly dispenses the Steripen to in-field operatives even though it recieved very low scores... Please explain this logical fallacy... or inherent contradiction...

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by goody5534 View Post
    Listen, I respect and appreciate all of the men and women who choose to serve in our military but their methodologies are never the "best of" therefore I dont take this study very seriously. There are (2) inhernent flaws with accepting this study as a Gold Standard. First its over 5 yrs old, how many of these products tested have been changed to perform better or worse since then? And, secondly the Army regularly dispenses the Steripen to in-field operatives even though it recieved very low scores... Please explain this logical fallacy... or inherent contradiction...
    I saw tons of illogical things the Army did when I was in.

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    03-22-2009
    Location
    Ashburnham, MA
    Age
    80
    Posts
    1,951
    Images
    2

    Default

    http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA449339

    I've just read the sections on testing the steripen, because I just bought one. It looks like they tested the 4xAA battery version. The results are not good.

    The steripen seems to do poorly in turbid (not clear) water. So, if the water isn't pretty clear, use something else. If the water is clear, maybe it'll work well-- or maybe NOT. The steripen prefilter doesn't seem to help much.

    UV works better on giardia and cryptosporidium, so maybe it makes sense to use the steripen in combination with chemicals. Chemicals take hours to kill giardia and crypto but work quickly on bacteria.

    Search the document for E-58-1 to find the steripen report.
    ANNEX 58 TO APPENDIX E DEVICE EVALUATION #58
    HYDRO-PHOTON, INC. – STERIPEN™
    ...
    Although the testing confirms the SteriPEN provides a 6-log bacteria and 4-log virus removal in
    clear (low turbidity) water only, it did not confirm the SteriPEN provides similar bacteria and
    virus log removals in more challenging (higher turbidity) water.
    ...
    Protozoan cysts (Giardia and Cryptosporidium) on
    the other hand are the least resistant, requiring very low UV doses
    ...
    In regards to determining effectiveness against
    microbiological pathogens a conservative approach is taken. Based on the manufacturer’s
    statement that this device is intended to treat clear water, independent testing challenging the
    device in clear water only (and a natural water of unknown turbidity), and the inconclusive effect
    of turbidity on UV disinfection, the SteriPEN is not expected to consistently provide adequate
    reduction of bacteria, viruses, and cysts even when using the optional prefilter when treating
    more turbid waters.
    ...

    There's another set of discouraging steripen tests on page E-58-7:
    ...Based on this testing, it is not likely that this device will consistently meet the log reduction requirements under any water
    conditions. ...
    Based on this I'm thinking of returning my steripen.

    There's an article on UV disinfection in this report on page F-5-1.

  14. #14
    Registered User Carl in FL's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-20-2011
    Location
    Port St. Lucie FL
    Age
    69
    Posts
    227

    Default

    I doubt the financial damage to a company due to a science fair project
    will even approach a fractional value of damage due to the Army report.

  15. #15
    Flip flop, flip flopping' LASHin' 2000 miler
    Join Date
    12-18-2010
    Location
    Northern Michigan
    Age
    69
    Posts
    1,175
    Journal Entries
    1
    Images
    42

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by goody5534 View Post
    There are (2) inhernent flaws with accepting this study as a Gold Standard. First its over 5 yrs old, how many of these products tested have been changed to perform better or worse since then? And, secondly the Army regularly dispenses the Steripen to in-field operatives even though it recieved very low scores... Please explain this logical fallacy... or inherent contradiction...
    Well, if you understood that military acquisitions are 90% politically motivated, you would understand the logic behind this.
    L Dog
    AT 2000 Miler
    The Laughing Dog Blog
    https://lighterpack.com/r/38fgjt
    "The clearest way into the Universe is through a forest wilderness." - John Muir

  16. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    05-26-2010
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Age
    61
    Posts
    1,410
    Images
    21

    Default

    It's just a study, a pretty good one, but nothing to get worked up about.

    In over 35 years of hiking and backpacking, I have never met anyone that got sick from drinking water treated by any commercial water treatment or filter designed for backpackers or hikers. I do know people that got sick not treating their water.

    I think it is a good guide to look at when shopping for a new treatment method, but it's just a guide not a gospel.

  17. #17
    Registered User dla's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-08-2004
    Location
    Hillsboro, Oregon
    Posts
    510

    Default

    One thing I didn't quite understand is how they rated disinfectant time. Katadyn micropur purification tablets have a max 4hr time with super cold water. The time is greatly reduced with warmer water. But they used the 4hr max time in all cases. Whereas a filter should have the same very short time regardless of temperature. Seems to me that they would have a bit more meaningful results if they had broken out disinfectants from filters, and then shown disinfectant performance versus water temp. Of course I didn't read all 666 pages to find out if they covered this issue.

    I carry katadyn micropur purification tablets because (a) they work and (b) they are lightweight and easy to use. But I don't wait 4hrs for 60*F water - more like 30 minutes. I don't have a problem reloading my water bladder on a hot hike and dumping in some katadyn micropur purification tablets and getting back on the trail - the time hasn't been an issue.

++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •