WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4
Results 61 to 65 of 65
  1. #61
    Registered User Lyle's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-25-2006
    Location
    Croswell, MI
    Age
    70
    Posts
    3,934
    Images
    68

    Default

    One other advantage to down that I haven't seen mentioned yet is that it is more "breathable". It is much more comfortable to sleep in a down bag in warmer weather, not as clammy feeling as most synthetics.

    I am not anti-synthetic, have used quite a few, still own several, but down is superior using most criteria.

  2. #62
    Registered User SassyWindsor's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-19-2007
    Location
    Knightsbridge, London UK
    Posts
    969

    Default

    Quite a few ways to get a sleeping bag soaked, usually accidental, sometimes carelessness. Worst case I've seen was during a bad rain/wind storm when a limb ripped through the tent. Had to stuff rain jacket into hole to slow down the deluge into the tent. Next day several layers of duct tape got stitched into the tear for a temporary fix. Down bag got pretty soaked and really didn't dry until a commercial dryer was found. Wet down bag = cold, sometimes unbearably cold.

  3. #63
    Getting out as much as I can..which is never enough. :) Mags's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-15-2004
    Location
    Colorado Plateau
    Age
    49
    Posts
    11,002

    Default

    Yeah..another link...but these questions do come up a lot.
    http://www.pmags.com/sleeping-bags-a...dirty-overview

    Or, to sum it up,

    So which is best? It all depends! As my friend Garlic put it once : "Down is always better..except when synthetic is better".


    If I had children outgrowing their gear, was a person who is not careful with their bag in wet weather, not sure if I wanted to get into backpacking or on a very small budget, I'd go with the synthetics.

    However, if you are an avid backpacker or camper, I think you are better off with down. A down bag is an investment and is less expensive than a synthetic bag in the long term.
    Paul "Mags" Magnanti
    http://pmags.com
    Twitter: @pmagsco
    Facebook: pmagsblog

    The true harvest of my life is intangible...a little stardust caught,a portion of the rainbow I have clutched -Thoreau

  4. #64

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tenderheart View Post
    Was just wondering if anyone had experience with the Kelty Cosmic 20 Deg down bag. Campmor has it for 90 bucks and weight is only 2.5 pounds. Hard to beat for the price.
    I reckon not.

  5. #65
    Registered User kayaker4ever's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-13-2011
    Location
    Tega Cay, South Carolina
    Age
    77
    Posts
    31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyle View Post
    Waterproof stuff sacks are fine, but a plastic bag inside the standard one that comes with your sleeping bag is virtually as effective and a lot cheaper. Besides, I don't think I've ever seen or heard of a sleeping bag getting wet when it was packed away, at least not to the point of being a problem. They are vulnerable when they are unpacked and being used. The type stuff sack you use won't make a bit of difference then.

    Just to clarify for the newbies.

    When you put a plastic bag inside the stuff sack and then try to pack the sleeping bag you will possibly rip the plastic. At any rate it won't last long. Best way to do it is pack your bag in the stuff sack the use the plastic bag and then a second slightly larger stuff sack. I used that combination for many years and never had a problem. If the extra stuff sack is too much weight then buy a WP stuff sack.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •