http://news.yahoo.com/two-young-camp...205131404.html
I assume they had food in the tent.
http://news.yahoo.com/two-young-camp...205131404.html
I assume they had food in the tent.
local news was saying that the two little kids weren't even attacked, but had "previous scratches" from a non-bear incident.
In today's news it's reported that their "wounds" were old scratches, though the bear did enter the camp and slash at the tent.
"It goes to show you never can tell." - Charles Edward Anderson Berry
By Ray Sanchez | Reuters – Wed, Aug 3, 2011 "Two young campers were attacked by a yearling black bear that entered their tent in New Jersey on Wednesday in the nation's latest bear mauling this summer, state officials said."
Is it possible that "reliable" news sources sometimes get it wrong?