WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 25
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    08-16-2011
    Location
    Boston, Massachusetts
    Posts
    318

    Default Hiking is twice as effecient as driving a car!

    So I have time off / plane tickets to go down to Atlanta in September and hike for at least 30 northbound along the AT.

    I was thinking about how much food I would need and I came to an interesting conclusion:

    5000 calories per day for 30 days = 150,000 k calories = ~594 k BTUs = ~627,000 k joules = ~ the amount of energy in 5.2 gallons of gasoline.

    My car gets 33 miles per gallon highway, so that means I could go about 171 miles. I am sure I will walk further than that on my AT trip (maybe twice as far), so it looks like not only is hiking better for your health, it is more efficient than driving as well!

    Put another way, if all that energy were concentrated in a single Twinkie, the Twinkie would be 91 feet wide, by 325 feet long, by 125 feet wide and would weigh 93 pounds! And to quote someone famous, "That's a big Twinkie!".

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    08-16-2011
    Location
    Boston, Massachusetts
    Posts
    318

    Default

    Of course I can't edit my posts - that should be 30 days and the Twinkie would be 91 feet wide, 325 feet long and 125 feet high!

  3. #3
    International Man of Mystery BobTheBuilder's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-23-2005
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Age
    59
    Posts
    619
    Images
    12

    Default

    Hmmmm - 150 k calories in a Twinkie means 1000 twinkies is 150,000 k calories. With dimensions of 1" x 1" x 4", a Twinkie has a volume of 4 cubic inches. 1000 of them would have a volume of 4000 cubic inches, or 2.3 cubic feet. Your mythical super-Twinkie is really only a Twinkie cube 1.3 feet, or 16 inches on each side.

    That's not that big of a Twinkie.

    While I'm at it, if you had to carry the same pack weight as your car, maybe about 3300 lbs, you would make a lot less miles. I'm just sayin'.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    08-16-2011
    Location
    Boston, Massachusetts
    Posts
    318

    Default

    I think you are right on the Twinkie example. 1000 Twinkies is a lot though. You could also eat ~255 Big Macs (590 cals each).

  5. #5
    Punchline RWheeler's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-04-2011
    Location
    Connecticut
    Age
    37
    Posts
    636
    Images
    1

    Default

    It's pretty standard to see energy efficiency drop as speed efficiency rises. That's why automobiles are used, they're terribly inefficient in terms of energy. Do a comparison to something like a motorcycle and it'd be a totally different situation (see Bob's weight comment).

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    08-16-2011
    Location
    Boston, Massachusetts
    Posts
    318

    Default

    I know. This was just a whimsical thing. I guess I could have just drank the 5 gallons of gas and been done!

  7. #7
    Punchline RWheeler's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-04-2011
    Location
    Connecticut
    Age
    37
    Posts
    636
    Images
    1

    Default

    That'd be a poor way to waste $20, though.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    08-16-2011
    Location
    Boston, Massachusetts
    Posts
    318

    Default

    It would be a lot cheaper than buying and eating 1000 Twinkies. The Twinkies just wouldn't kill you as fast...

  9. #9

    Default

    Not really a fair comparison. Your car probably weights over 1500 pounds, or roughly ten times your weight. But fun to think about.

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    08-16-2011
    Location
    Boston, Massachusetts
    Posts
    318

    Default

    It is interesting to think about how many calories we use to produce a single calorie of food for human consumption. For my whole trip, 150K calories seemed like a lot. I read somewhere that it takes about 10 calories of energy to produce/transport one calorie of food for human consumption. That 30-day 150K requirement then becomes 1.5 million.

    Before I started hiking, I consumed 5000 calories per day and weighed just over 400 lbs. Now that I hike a lot, I weigh 1/2 as much, but need to consume as many calories while hiking!

  11. #11

    Default

    Wow,and I thought I had a lot of time on my hands,turns out I'm just not that smart.And besides.My car is on a low lead diet,hamburgers make her belch and buck.

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    04-28-2004
    Location
    New Brunswick
    Age
    61
    Posts
    11,116

    Default

    It would be interesting to know who has the record for hiking the AT on the least number of calories.

  13. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JAK:1261510
    It would be interesting to know who has the record for hiking the AT on the least number of calories.
    Probably the youngest to ever finish the trail would be my guess.

  14. #14

    Default

    Since this isn't in the hiking-humor forum (I had to scan back to the top to check) I have to wonder what kind of engineers some of you are to come up with these calculations.

    How heavy is that 'super-twinkie'? By my calculation 1 ounce on my back translates to 200 lbs of pounding on my feet per mile hiked, or 2000 lbs in a 10 mile day. (Varies considerably according to the length of your pace and speed of hiking.)

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    08-16-2011
    Location
    Boston, Massachusetts
    Posts
    318

    Default

    I miscalculated the twinkie thing badly. Sorry. The Twinkie would be much smaller than I said. My dumb-ass mistake.

  16. #16
    CDT - 2013, PCT - 2009, AT - 1300 miles done burger's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-03-2005
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,437

    Default

    Your math is off. If you were in a coma, you'd still burn about 2000 calories a day (maybe less if you weren't moving at all). So the hiking itself only uses about 3000 calories a day. When you compute it like that, hiking is even more efficient compared to driving.

  17. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-28-2008
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Age
    71
    Posts
    4,907

    Default

    What's the deal with the Twinkies? The proper unit of food energy is the Snickers.
    "It's fun to have fun, but you have to know how." ---Dr. Seuss

  18. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    08-16-2011
    Location
    Boston, Massachusetts
    Posts
    318

    Default

    Right "Lots and lots of Snickers."

    1 snickers bar = 277 k calories. 150K k calories / 277 = ~542 snickers bars. 1 snickers bar = 2.0z. 542 * 2 / 16 = ~68 lbs of snickers bars.

    I would bring an extra 20 lbs to fling during the approach.

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    04-28-2004
    Location
    New Brunswick
    Age
    61
    Posts
    11,116

    Default

    I belive the proper SI unit is a French pain au chocolat.

  20. #20
    Digger takethisbread's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-11-2009
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,062
    Journal Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Feral Bill View Post
    What's the deal with the Twinkies? The proper unit of food energy is the Snickers.
    that's what I was thinking.
    YOUTUBE: https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCMDkRcGP1yP20SOD-oiSGcQ
    Instagram: DIGGER_PCT_2016
    twitter: @takethisbread
    AT 2x, LT, JMT, CT, Camino, Ireland Coast to Coast, HWT, WT, NET, NST, PCT

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •