WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 22 of 22
  1. #21
    Registered User FarmerChef's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-03-2012
    Location
    Northwestern, VA (outside of Harper's Ferry)
    Posts
    1,800
    Images
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OzJacko View Post
    Two part answer.
    1. The hike will get you at a weight and aerobic fitness to do the marathon barring injury.
    2. You will need to prepare between the two to "tone" your running muscles. While hiking and running are both primarily leg exercise they are different. You need to immediately after the hike start a healthy eating regimen as your body energy reserves will be low, and start a gentle but increasing running program (not severe!) to transfer your "fitness" to the correct foot and leg muscles etc.
    +1 here. Take my comments with a grain of salt since I've never completed a thru or a full marathon (yet). For now, I usually hike in 10 day blocks and average pretty high miles. I also run about 30 miles per week and run half marathons, 10ks, and the like. My first full marathon will be in the spring.

    So, disclaimer aside, what I can say from personal experience is that running can't fully prepare you for hiking nor can hiking fully prepare you for running. As Oz and others pointed out it's a different emphasis on the muscles. When I hit the trail while in marathon training (speedwork, long runs, etc.), I'm usually much more gassed on the hills than I was when I was doing more cross-training on the stairmill or setting the treadmill to it's highest elevation. That has been a rude awakening. However, the cardio conditioning that fast running or moderately fast hiking share is complimentary so it's a net even in my opinion.

    Conversely, after I return from a long hike (say 175 miles) it takes me about a week to recover to where I can run again. But once I have, I have much more power on the upside of the hills with slightly slower speed in the flats (a week off running isn't enough to slow you down that much, a thru on the other hand...). As others have posted, my feet hurt, my knees are sometimes sore and there's an, um, "hitch" to my step Oh, and right on with Jeff earlier about the shoe size. I've gone up a full size in my running shoes from a 10/10.5 to 11/11.5 And I need AAA width. It probably looks like a clown came through after I've hiked a muddy section.

    So I guess it comes down to whether you will be running for time or just running to finish. I would certainly say that a thru hike would leave you with a good to great cardio capacity, lower overall weight and overall stronger legs, all positives in the running book. So you could, as others have done, hop right off and run a marathon. Not sure it would be your PR or feel the best but I'd definitely say you'd have an advantage on a hilly course.
    2,000 miler. Still keepin' on keepin' on.

  2. #22

    Default

    Awesome advice everyone. Thank you so much!

    I'm for sure not worried about a PR for this particular race; my only goal will be to get my brother through his first one. He won't be running for a BQ or anything close so it sounds like finishing the race won't be much of an issue...depending on how my hike goes of course. But the important thing right now is that I know it's possible, I can buy my entry/bib, and just be flexible/realistic come next September.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •