WhiteBlaze Pages 2024
A Complete Appalachian Trail Guidebook.
AVAILABLE NOW. $4 for interactive PDF(smartphone version)
Read more here WhiteBlaze Pages Store

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Registered User Saluki's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-06-2012
    Location
    Saranac Lake, NY
    Posts
    46

    Exclamation SS vs aluminum pots and cooking time

    I just did a little experiment to see how long it would take to heat up water to boiling using my trusty Svea stove. First I put 2 cups of cold tap water in my newish stainless steel pot, fired the Svea and set the timer. It took 6 minutes 30 seconds to get to a rolling boil. This was in a semi-outdoors area - my back porch - where the air temp was 17F.
    Next I did the same thing using the aluminum pot from my 40 year old Sigg-Tourist set. The water came to a rolling boil in 4 minutes 30 seconds. Two minutes quicker than the SS pot! Has anyone else noticed this phenomenon?

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    01-28-2008
    Location
    Spokane, WA
    Age
    71
    Posts
    4,907

    Default

    I need to know more to comment. Was your Svea , besides being the best stove ever, completely warmed up before each trial? Were the pot shapes roughly the same? Were there any other unaccounted variables? How many trials did you do?
    "It's fun to have fun, but you have to know how." ---Dr. Seuss

  3. #3
    Registered User Saluki's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-06-2012
    Location
    Saranac Lake, NY
    Posts
    46

    Default

    I warmed the Svea up to get it fired , but didn't start timing until the start flame was out and the stove was burning clean. Once the stove was burning clean I set the pot and began timng. The pot shapes and sizes were almost identical. I only did the one trial for each, but it definitly appeared that the aluminum pot went from "fish-eyes" to "full" boil musch quicker than the SS. The SS pot seemed to stay at the "fish-eyes" stage for a much longer time.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    04-15-2011
    Location
    Lowell, MA
    Posts
    1,319

    Default

    Not surprising, as aluminum has much better thermal conductivity than stainless steel.

  5. #5
    irreverent
    Join Date
    03-18-2009
    Location
    kent island, Md
    Age
    60
    Posts
    114
    Images
    168

    Default

    Yeah, it's true I tested my ss msr pot against same size primus aluminum (black) pot. same quantity of same temp tap water on my warmed up home propane stove....aluminum much faster!

  6. #6
    Registered User 4Bears's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-25-2009
    Location
    Mishawaka, IN
    Age
    71
    Posts
    702

    Default

    This is why SS kitchen cookware has aluminum bonded to the bottom. Stainless tends to have hot spots thus uneven heating, equalling poor heat transfer.
    "You have brains in your head/You have feet in your shoes/You can steer yourself in any direction you choose." - Dr. Seuss

++ New Posts ++

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •